Year in review 2024: Innovations, successes and new perspectives
The year 2024 was a groundbreaking one for Can Do, marked by exciting developments and impressive innovations. In this review, we would like to...
Your IT can't wait any longer to install the new version of an enterprise software? Are you planning the launch of another program? When it comes to digitalization, you finally want to get things off the ground faster? Then you should rethink the decision-making and implementation processes in your company! In this short article, our CEO Thomas Schlereth explains what matters. And why a ramp-up makes so much sense.
One of the main activities of IT departments in companies is the introduction of new or additional business software. This can be, for example, a commercial system for order management, a new document management system, a complete ERP system or even a project and resource management system.
This article describes two procedures, how companies proceed with such a "rollout", which advantages and disadvantages the two procedures have and why which procedure is used at all.
Since the 1950s, companies have been using computer programs to make processes more efficient. Initially, it was mainly public authorities and financial companies that used customized solutions; today, on the other hand, standard solutions are mainly in use. The classic procedure for introducing a standard solution is similar to the procedure for developing a customized solution. Although the first standard software for companies came onto the German market as early as the 1970s and SAP's R/3® was introduced in 1992, little has changed in the procedure to date.
Classic project management methods are often referred to as "waterfall" projects. Here, projects are divided into phases that are carried out one after the other. The classic process that precedes a software launch is very similar; the phases in the launch of a new product are:
Each party involved formulates individual requirements and wishes, whereupon various suppliers of standard products are sifted through. A long decision-making phase follows before the rollout finally begins. At the end, users are trained and supported. However, it often turns out that this method does not work. There are several reasons for this, e.g. the company does not have the necessary know-how or the number of people involved is too large. The bottom line is that the company does not work closely enough with the vendor, and disruptive changes occur during the project. In the process, the parties involved are often only focused on the point that is most important to them: signing the purchase agreement.
The ramp-up procedure accommodates the wishes of the individual users: The software is quickly deployed and evaluated by the users. Ramp-up turns the waterfall process around and prioritizes the technical evaluation over other internal decision paths. The classic waterfall approach designs theoretical sample solutions that are not necessarily suitable for end users. The ramp-up process prioritizes benefits to the business and is relevant in a rapidly evolving technology world.
A company recognizes weaknesses in project and resource management and looks for solutions. Various vendors present their solutions, but without typical sales presentations. Instead, consultants and users communicate directly. The provider makes the software available in the cloud and is compensated for this. Together, an initial use case is defined and implemented. An overview of ongoing projects is created. Further use cases are defined and implemented iteratively. The solution possibly becomes established in further departments and finally in the company - or is discontinued.
One method of successfully introducing a software solution is to offer it as a monthly rental for a department. This eliminates a complicated investment process and only a few people are involved. The solution is deployed in the cloud and can be tested immediately by the end users. The solution has to prove itself every month, and the decision makers are the users themselves. Know-how is created at the customer through gradual deployment and optimization. Other departments and IT systems are only integrated if there is a visible benefit for the users.
Both methods have advantages and disadvantages, but the trend is toward the ramp-up method. Management should promote departments in this method to increase acceptance and reduce costs. The ramp-up method should generally be considered for every new acquisition of an IT solution.
This text is a summary of an article written by Thomas Schlereth for the Can Do Knowledge Base. The detailed version with further results and findings is available via this link.
The year 2024 was a groundbreaking one for Can Do, marked by exciting developments and impressive innovations. In this review, we would like to...
The PM Forum Day of the PMI® Austria Chapter took place on November 13, 2024 - an inspiring day full of new perspectives and insights into the latest...
Engineering and planning offices are the driving force behind many industries, from construction and manufacturing to energy and environmental...